Council Takes Another Step Toward Automated Garage

Construction plans are in the works for a $16 million parking structure at Weho City Hall.

The West Hollywood City Council voted unanimously Monday to move closer to realizing its vision for a fully automated parking structure at City Hall.

The 200-space facility will cost $16 million, according to a staff report. The preliminary design calls for a five-story building that rises to a height of nearly 50 feet and occupies 11,000 of the building site's 25,000 square feet. The project also includes a 4,000 square-foot public plaza.

Automated garages use state-of-the-art computer technology to store vehicles in parking berths via motorized lifts, conveyers and shuttles, according to the website of Unitronics, an Israeli company the city has hired to provide and install the project's robotic elements.

"The building structure will be concrete with decorative finish materials to be determined in the next phase of design," the report states. "A portion of the east facade will be glass to allow for viewing of the internal operation of the automated system. The glass wall will incorporate art by Ned Kahn."

Council members called the project innovative and cost effective over the long term despite the parking structure's multimillion-dollar price tag.

"Parking in a structure like the one that's proposed at City Hall is so much more efficient," Councilman John Heilman said. "It really is the wave of the future, which is going to be in the long run much more cost effective."

A number of residents and local business people said the parking facility is a welcomed addition to West Hollywood, especially in the city's the central section where parking is always in short supply.

"It is by far the best solution for urban planning and use of space," said Chris Bonbright, who noted that automated parking structures accommodate the same large number of vehicles as a sprawling parking lot "dead zone."

Stephanie Harker criticized the $16 million price tag, the majority of which will be paid for by municipal debt.

"Because of our triple-A bond rating we're able to get very low interest rates and then service that debt from the revenues we receive from the parking," Councilman John Duran said. "The resources of the parking structure are going to pay back the debt service on the bond."

Harker also opposed the project's current scope.

"The community service portions of the original project are gone," she said. "The community service center and parking became automated parking garage and community plaza."

Mayor Jeffrey Prang explained the intention was to have a "community service center" consisting of city staff offices, not community rooms for public meetings and events.

In the next phase of the project's design process the city's architect, LPA Inc., and construction consultants will create detailed plans that must be approved by the Building and Safety Division and county agencies such as the Fire Department and Flood Control District.

Be sure to follow West Hollywood Patch on Twitter and "Like" us on Facebook.

Rudolf Martin December 20, 2012 at 10:13 PM
i'm not concerned about city politics. my comments and questions were about a specific project which happens to be the subject of this article.
Brian Hamilton December 21, 2012 at 07:22 AM
Thank you, Rudolph. It's apparently difficult for some people to focus on an issue without attempting to distract you with extraneous, irrelevant noise.
Ali December 21, 2012 at 11:56 PM
Oh my goodness Scott. You paint the anti-incumbents like a mob. They are individuals who, mostly, have lived in this city a long time and are sick of the same people being re-elected time after time. The people on the council don't take us into consideration on things, they just do what they want without input, most of the time, from citizens. There are a few women who take a great deal of time researching these projects the council comes up with. They do not have knee-jerk reactions to anything. They present their research to the people here and everybody makes their own decisions. You just go with whatever the Council wants, like a sheep. You have no credibility at all. You say you are not an expert on details. Then don't criticize those who have details. You obviously don't care as much about the future of the city as they do.
Ali December 21, 2012 at 11:58 PM
Oh, and in fairness, I should say, I agree with them most of the time. I listen to the research and findings they have come up with and make my own decision. I have never agreed with you.
Profes Shivers December 23, 2012 at 07:22 PM
Yes Ali (and Rudolph), you are both correct. I have lived here 2 1/2 years and have followed these goings-on with amazement and frustration. Scott is somebody's shill and never fails to either distract or muddy the waters. I've come to realize he should always be ignored. Thanks though for the clarity of your 2 voices.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »