Naples Restaurateur Fights Foie Gras Ban

Force-feeding geese is "actually humane," group says. Owner of Second Street establishments joins Chris Cosentino of Incanto and 60 other chefs and restaurant owners in fighting a California law banning goose liver.

Restaurants are the ultimate mom and pop small businesses upon which many cities have thrived. They can define a sense of place and their signature dishes certainly can as well. Bouchon has Escargot, New York's Daniels has its caviar, and local Naples hotspot has its foie gras.

However, when a 2004 California law banning the production and sale of foie gras goes into effect this July, restaurants around the state will be forced to take the delicacy off the menu, and Michael's owner Michael Dene is none to happy about it.

Foie gras, also known as fattened goose or duck liver, is a delicacy that has been served since ancient Egyptian times.

Dene, along with his head chef David Coleman, are standing with more than 60 other prominent chefs from Los Angeles to San Francisco--Incanto's Chris Cosentino among them--who believe the new law is an over reach by government, but also a reversible mistake.

The group, known as the Coalition for Humane and Ethical Farming Standards (CHEFS) charges that the law banning foie gras is based on years-old information that is no longer correct and that a total ban on goose liver will only create a black market for the delicacy.

Twice a year, migrating birds such as ducks and geese gorge themselves on food before embarking on their long migratory path.  This bi-yearly habit results in a naturally-fattened liver that is sought after by chefs across the world. This natural process has since been replicated by farmers who force feed their geese to fatten the birds' livers for use in foie gras dishes.

"State government mandating rules about whether we can eat a certain type food is the epitome of hypocrisy," said Dene, who also owns and added that his two restaurants serve about 30 dishes per night that contain goose liver.

"A food product ... satisfying the culinary taste of millions of people should not be banned," Dene said.

While the sale of goose liver has been banned in other countries, California is currently the only state in the U.S. that has enacted laws banning foie gras and restaurateurs across the greater Los Angeles area and others in Northern California are trying to do something about it.

When the law was passed, proponents of the bill argued that the process of force feeding farm-raised ducks and geese to fatten their livers was both inhumane and unethical. 

CHEF, however, argues that since the law was passed, there has been new research showing the process for fattening the birds' livers is actually humane.  In addition, restaurants joining CHEF say they only source foie gras from farms with sustainable and humane farming practices.

"My restaurant and many other restaurants in the state of California have built a business around sustainable food and locally-farmed products," explained Dene. 

"We buy from farms that treat their animals with respect and maintain humane standards," he said. 

Dene says that when he is eventually forced to take foie gras off the menu, his business is going to suffer. 

According to Dene what might seem like a signature niche market actually plays a role in an economic food chain in Southern California that helps other related businesses thrive. He says high-end food caters to sophisticated local tastes as well as the business entertainment, business convention diner, and personal travel markets.

"This ban will cause a hardship to our business as well as a financial burden," Dene said in an email.  "In this very challenging time, businesses need to offer more to differentiate themselves, not less," he said. 

Nancy Wride February 14, 2012 at 06:13 PM
A point chefs make is that turkeys, in nature, are not 25 pounds but less than 8 pounds, but somehow people are okay with whatever transpires there. Are you vegetarian, Luis?
Dave Chambers February 14, 2012 at 11:33 PM
Let's be honest, making it illegal to fatten a goose to be enjoyed by a small percentage of well-heeled gourmands is not the first place to start farming reform. Why not begin with our country's cattle feed lots? Abolishing these putrid conditions would improve what goes into 95% of American's stomachs. That seems like a logical place to begin restricting inhumane and unhealthy animal husbandry practices.
Dave Chambers February 14, 2012 at 11:34 PM
I agree, Angel, but fear the box has already been opened.
Dave Chambers February 14, 2012 at 11:37 PM
Luis, I respect your decision to vote with your dollars!
Angel February 15, 2012 at 05:55 PM
Why don't we focus on making it illegal for allowing people to be fattened up by the ridiculously large amounts of Fast Food eateries all over our communities. Especially in less to-do communities that cannot afford Foie Gras in their local restaurants. It should be illegal for so many of those places to poison our communities. I feel bad about the good but worse about the obese 8 year olds.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »